Saturday, February 02, 2008

Beltronics STi-R (BEL STiR) and Escort Passport 9500ci Remote Radar Detectors : CES 2008

Update 14 May 09: Veil Guy's Full Long-term Beltronics STi-R Review
These Are Exciting Times for Radar Detector Owners!

For many, the big news at the 2008 Consumer Electronics Show was the bombshell announcement by Warner Brothers that they were dropping support of HD DVD while committing to Sony's competing HD media format: Blu-ray.

As big as this news was, in my book Warner Brothers announcement ran a distant second to the formal announcements made by both Beltronics and Escort for the upcoming 2008 radar detector model year.

As my long-time readers already know, Beltronics and Escort have produced serious innovative enthusiast driver safety tools in the form of two ground-breaking products for 2006 and 2007—the Beltronics STi Driver radar detector and the Escort Passport 9500i radar detector.


Refusing to rest on their laurels with these two benchmark-setting radar detectors, both sister companies have raised the ante, for 2008, with their respective flagship windshield models to achieve even higher performance thresholds in two remote-vehicle-installation packages, the Beltronics STiR and Escort Passport 9500ci.

Beltronics STiR


While the Beltronics STi-R has been available abroad for several months now, the BEL STi-R is just now making its U.S. debut. Like its windshield-mounted counterpart the BEL STi Driver, the BEL STi-R will be undetectable by all radar detector detectors (RDDs) such as the mighty SPECTRE/Stalcar Mk. III.

Improvements to the Beltronics STi-R platform comes in two primary forms, segmented Ka-band reception and improved police laser (lidar) reception.

Taking their Beltronics RX-65 Pro, Ka International, feature to the next performance level, the Beltronics STi-R's user-selectable multi-segmented Ka reception should further improve Ka detecting/alerting reception quickness by allowing the user to selectively turn on/off up to 10 portions of the Ka police radar and thus, reduce the time it takes for the radar detector to fully listen/sweep this very wide Ka-band.

This capability should appeal very much to existing European users of another very popular remote radar detector in their market—the Beltronics Vector 975Rr, which also provided selective Ka reception—and since the fines and demerit points for getting caught using a radar detector in some countries abroad can be very very steep, indeed, the stealth nature of the Bel STiR provides a distinct advantage over its older cousin the Bel Vector 975R.

While our European friends will want to enable Ka 34.0Ghz and Ka 34.3Ghz reception for Gatso/Multanova radar speed traps (and externally mount the antennae vertically to maximize their reception to vertical polarized police radar), we North American drivers can selectively disable those reception bands (and externally mount the antennae horizontally) to focus only on the ones currently being used in our part of the world—namely 33.8Ghz, 34.7Ghz, and 35.5Ghz Ka.

With the ability to turn-off reception to every other Ka frequency, we drivers should achieve even higher levels of Ka reception performance while at the same time dramatically cut down on Ka-falses (from other "junk" radar detectors).

This capability has the potential to be one of the hottest features to ever appear in a radar detector and may position the Beltronics STi-R as the first universally effective radar detector in the world!

I hope Beltronics will give serious consideration to incorporating this innovative capability into their windshield-mount BEL STi Driver!

Given the already astounding levels of reception performance by the Beltronics STi Driver, the performance envelope of the Beltronics STi-R promises to exceed everything we have ever seen, to date.

Laser reception should also dramatically improve over the windshield-mounted Beltronics STi Driver, if for no other reason than the proximity of the BEL STi-R's frontal laser reception module will be closer to the primary aiming points of your vehicle—the license plate and headlights.


The Beltronics STi-R consists of five primary components—the control module, display module (red LED), the Interface module, the combined radar/laser receiver, and an amplified speaker.

At a suggested retail of $1099.95, the Beltronics STi-R may very well be the smartest investment to driver safety enhancement we can choose, for many years to come.

Escort Passport 9500ci

What do you get when you combine the hardware reception platform of the leading radar detector model with the advanced filtering capabilities of the first GPS-incorporated radar detector—the Escort Passport 9500i—in a remote vehicle installation package?


You get the Escort Passport 9500ci, of course (the "ci" stands for custom installed).

Expected to retail at just under $2000.00, the Escort Passport 9500ci is the new flagship offering of Escort and combines the performance of their new laser jammer (laser shifter), the ZR4 (more on this later).

Unlike the Escort Passport 9500i, the Escort Passport 9500ci uses the hardware reception platform of the Beltronics STi Driver to provide its owner with a completely stealth/undetectable radar detector which remains invisible to the likes of the SPECTRE/Stalcar Mk. III radar detector detector (RDD).


The Escort Passport 9500ci consists of nine primary components including three laser jamming heads, a blue LED display module, and a color-coded interface module supporting modular connections to all of the Escort Passport 9500ci components to enable DIY and professional installers a much easier and streamlined installation.


The Escort Passport 9500ci incorporates a new "intelligent" filtering mechanism called Adaptive Signal Processing (ASP) which automatically "learns" recurring fixed radar sources by GPS coordinates and will auto-mute out these learned "falses" without driver intervention while retaining reception sensitivity to any other bonafide police radar sources.

While the hardware platform is now shared by both remote radar detectors, they will retain their individual reception personalities that have traditionally forged each brand.

In otherwords, the Beltronics STi-R will continue to perform like a Beltronics radar detector and the Escort Passport 9500ci will continue to perform like an Escort/Passport radar detector.


What do I mean by this?

Having driving many miles [over many years] with the Beltronics RX-65 Pro and the Escort Passport 8500 X50, I can attest that both of these radar detectors are distinctly different, even though they too shared electronic components.

It's interesting to note that even certain other formal review[er]s have missed these nuances in their "objective" field tests. These "subjective" differences can only be fully appreciated after extended seat-time in the real-world. The same goes for the Passport 9500i and the Beltronics STi Driver and will most certainly go for the Escort Passport 9500ci and the Beltronics STi-R.

If basically comes down to the different philosophies of each brand.

I personally liken the performance of Beltronics to that of BMW and of Escort to that of Mercedes—both exceptional coach builders, each however, with a distinct personality.

I have never cared for the expression "Belscort" because I believe such [often pejorative] references to the individual Beltronics and Escort brands are not only inaccurate, but only serve to blur the distinctions which clearly exist in each.

No one in their right mind would confuse a Cadillac CTS-V with a Chevrolet Corvette Z06, even though they are both GM products and share some components. The same goes for CM (Cincinnati Microwave) and their individual Beltronics and Escort models.

Whichever brand you ultimately choose, you can rest assured that with either one, you will be treated to the highest level of performance available from two companies which are passionately committed to "raising-the-bar" in the performance of driver safety equipment.

I am looking forward to the time when I can share my first-hand real-world driving experiences with each of these fine products.

Trusted Purchasing Source(s):

Related Reading:


11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm looking for detector/jammer for my Ridgeline. This new escort has both, can you compare to Blinders M45? What's the best package to accomplish both?

Veil Guy said...

Although I have yet to formally evaluate the performance capabilities of the new Blinder M45 (four head model), some users have called into question the consistency of its operation (relative to the M40).

In so far as the ZR4 is concerned, if its (as I would expect) at least as good and reliable as the ZR3 which preceded it, now has the ability to jam (ie; shift) LA's stealth mode, provides a rear mounted laser jamming head atop the license plate (a more elegant and proper location, in my opinion) for a rear jamming head, while providing seamless integration into most of Beltronics and Escort radar detector models, I would fully expect the ZR4 Shifter to be an exceptional choice for your Ridgeline.

I only wish that the ZR4 would support an extra license plate head for any potential front plate users or additional heads (two perhaps) for particularly large vehicles.

However with the use of Veil and/or Ontrack's license plate covers (such as their LaserShield) extra heads may prove to be totally unnecessary. Only time will tell.

When we have spent time with a ZR4 on my large silver sedan (BMW 5 Series) I will provide a more thorough response (in the form of a "review").

Josh said...

Does anyone know what the Escort Passport 9500i is made of? The STI driver is of course made of metal--- but is the Escort Passport 9500i just made of plastic?

Thanks.

Veil Guy said...

Josh,

Yes, indeed. The Passport 9500i is made of the similar and very tough plastic housing found on the Passport 8500 X50 and Beltronics RX-65 Pro radar detectors.

The magnesium metal housing is found on only two radar detectors: The Beltronics STI Driver and the Valentine One.

Anonymous said...

I was looking to get a top-notch radar detector and I read that the Bel STi was the first one built from the ground up for the "professional driver." What exactly is a professional driver?

Anonymous said...

I believe they mean a someone who drives commercially, as in many (all?) states, radar detectors are illegal in commerical vehicles. Since the STi is invisible, commerical drivers can use it more safely than a traditional radar detector.

Anonymous said...

Hello,
What is the distance that a certain frequency is locked out from a saved gps point ?
And how narrow will be its frequency steps that will be ignored or alerted on, for instance a door opener on 24.135 Ghz is locked out, and a police car sits next to it with a 24.125 Ghz radar, what will it do ?
Thanks already

tim said...

Mr. Veil, I am looking to invest in a high end detector, the sti-r or the 9500ci. You mentioned that the sti is equated with a cadillac and the ci with the mercedes, I would drive both of those cars. Could you tell me the difference? I know they are both great detectors, does one excel with city and one with highway?

Sir Speedalot said...

Where is the best location to install the Stir plus detector, in the grill or behind? If in the grill, can this be done for a 2010 Tundra?

Sir Speedalot said...

Where is the best location to install the Stir plus detector, in the grill or behind? If in the grill, can this be done for a 2010 Tundra?

Veil Guy said...

I have an M3 remote placed behind my bumper and performance did not seem greatly affected.

I also have had an M3 remote placed behind my vehicle's kidney grill. Performance was also quite good.

I now have one mounted externally of both with an unobstructed view. Performance may be very very slightly higher.

But I would prefer a little stealth in appearance and so I would prefer the first two mounting locations, personally.